Life expectancies in the EU have increased significantly over the past decades and are expected to continue increasing. Age-specific health statuses have also generally been improving. In contrast to these profound changes, the concepts that demographers have used
to analyze aging on a population level have remained largely static. The substantial changes in life expectancy and health status have rendered these traditional demographic measures inadequate for the analysis of aging at the population level in the 21st century.
A better understanding of age and aging, for both science and policy, requires new approaches. This project will comprehensively reassess population aging based on innovative alternative definitions of age and aging as pioneered by the project leader Sergei Scherbov and his colleagues.
Based on previous groundbreaking research that was published in Nature and Science, the project will produce new scientific knowledge that is useful in policy formulation and that can educate the public about population aging and its consequences. Among other things, the project will ascertain the extent to which advanced societies are actually aging in multiple dimensions, including health, cognitive abilities, and longevity. By addressing such fundamental issues this project will likely have a pronounced impact on future population aging research.
The Characteristics Approach to the measurement of population aging implies the consistent use of changing characteristic schedules together with changing age structures, regardless of the exact way in which the two are combined.
The concept of “prospective age” adjusts traditional age using information on further life expectancy, which means looking not just at how long a person has lived, but taking into account how much longer a person is expected to live.
Characteristics Approach to the measurement of population aging
Warren Sanderson and Sergei Scherbov have developed a new paradigm in conceptualizing population aging: the Characteristics Approach to the measurement of population aging. The hallmark of the approach is the consistent use of changing characteristic schedules together with changing age structures, regardless of the exact way in which the two are combined. The proposed approach includes conventional measure of chronological age but is far more general. For concreteness, the initial focus was made on four characteristics: chronological age as a quantitative benchmark against which importance of the other characteristics is to be assessed; remaining life expectancy for producing a forward-looking definition of age; the mortality rate as a rough but easily measurable health indicator; and the proportion of adult person-years lived after a particular age that can be used to construct a simple hypothetical demographically indexed public pension system.
Together these four characteristics provide a perspective on an age-old question: how old do you need to be to be considered “old”? In this case, the α-age/threshold of being old generally varies over time. The resulting trajectories are called by the authors “transition trajectories” – one for each of the four characteristics.
The new approach has strong implications both for research and policy. As the conventional old-age dependency ratios and their counterparts where threshold of being old is changing can behave quite differently, it is worth reexamining studies on, for example, dependency ratio effects on economic growth, using the characteristics approach. A similar approach can also be used in place of chronological ages in investigations and forecasts of health care expenditures.
Sanderson WC & Scherbov S (2014). Measuring the speed of aging across population subgroups. PLoS ONE 9 (5): e96289. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0096289.
Sanderson WC & Scherbov S (2013). The characteristics approach to the measurement of population aging. Population and Development Review 39 (4): 673-685. DOI:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00633.x.
Lutz W, Sanderson WC, & Scherbov S (2008). The coming acceleration of global population ageing. Nature 451 (7179): 716-719. DOI:10.1038/nature06516.
Sanderson WC & Scherbov S (2005). Average remaining lifetimes can increase as human populations age. Nature 435 (7043): 811-813. DOI:10.1038/nature03593.
This project has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement No 323947. Project Name: Reassessing Aging from a Population Perspective, Re-Ageing.
Last edited: 18 April 2018
01.04.2013 - 31.03.2019
08 Aug 2019 - 09 Aug 2019
The Characteristics Approach to Population Aging: New Measures (Version 2, December, 2015)
Analyzing Population Aging from a New Perspective
Sanchez-Niubo A, Egea-Cortés L, Olaya B, Caballero F, Ayuso-Mateos J, Prina M, Bobak M, Arndt H, et al. (2019). Cohort profile: The Ageing Trajectories of Health – Longitudinal Opportunities and Synergies (ATHLOS) project. International Journal of Epidemiology DOI:10.1093/ije/dyz077. (In Press)
Gietel-Basten S & Scherbov S ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0881-1073 (2019). Better way to measure ageing in Oceania that takes life expectancy into account. Australasian Journal on Ageing DOI:10.1111/ajag.12692. (In Press)
All project publications
Demographic Data Sheets
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
Phone: (+43 2236) 807 0 Fax:(+43 2236) 71 313