Overview

ASA research ultimately aims to produce, practice, and prototype novel system-analytical approaches, methods and tools, which enable solving problems that cannot be addressed by existing tools, or which enable addressing problems more efficiently.

© Aprescindere | Dreamstime.com

© Aprescindere | Dreamstime.com

Referring to the methodological dimension of the IIASA’s mandate, the ASA Program’s overall mission is to advance systems analysis by substantiating the integration of systems methods and applied research on problems of global relevance and universal importance. Central to this mission is the exploratory development of mathematical methods and analytical techniques to investigate complex systems undergoing global change with a focus on an integrated, interdisciplinary approach. 

ASA’s research is organized around three mutually complementing and cross-fertilizing methodological research domains. 

Optimal behavior of systems






  • Focus on how decision making can be formalized in models, notably, under uncertainty and risks, and what consequences different decisions yield
  • Develop decision support tools and applications, which are traditionally based on the optimization of a utility describing decision-maker’s preferences
  • Employ and advance methods of the optimization theory, control theory, theory of dynamic systems, and other related fields
  • Applications to economic models, notably, long-term economic growth (also under environmental constraints) and resource management models

Interactions within systems






  • Focus on the role of indirect links and connectivity between individual systems within a larger networked system
  • Employ and advance methods of the graph theory, information theory, network analysis and other related fields are employed
  • Develop network-based modeling and assessment frameworks
  • Ecological and social applications
  • Some methodologies are also being transferred to other disciplinary areas, for example, to economics, energy policy, and resource management 

System transitions and resilience of systems





  • Focus on systems of systems, characterized by complex dynamics, decentralized decision-making, and significant uncertainties with the aim to study system’s resilience
  • Experiment with qualitative (e.g., soft systems mapping) and quantitative (e.g., agent-based modeling) methods and approaches to evaluate possible consequences of extreme shocks affecting the system under study and, based on that, system resilience
  • Develop novel methods of data analysis aiming to identify precursors of system flips and general patterns via learning from the past 

More info is available under the following links:

In accordance with its strategy, ASA is actively maintaining and expanding its network consisting of methodologists, applied scientists and decision-makers all over the world, and, based on it, develops international and interdisciplinary collaboration.




Print this page

Last edited: 16 February 2016

CONTACT DETAILS

Elena Rovenskaya

Program Director

Advanced Systems Analysis

T +43(0) 2236 807 608

PUBLICATIONS

Eker S & Kwakkel JH (2018). Including robustness considerations in the search phase of Many-Objective Robust Decision Making. Environmental Modelling & Software 105: 201-216. DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.029.

Gatti RC, Fath B, Hordijk W, Kauffman S, & Ulanowicz R (2018). Niche emergence as an autocatalytic process in the evolution of ecosystems. Journal of Theoretical Biology DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.05.038. (In Press)

Strelkovskii N & Orlov S (2018). A method for calculation of program package elements for singular clusters. In: International conference "Systems Analysis: Modeling and Control" in memory of Academician A. V. Kryazhimskiy, June 2018, Moscow, Russia.

Gao J, Xu X, Cao G-Y, Ermoliev Y, Ermolieva T, & Rovenskaya E (2018). Optimizing Regional Food and Energy Production under Limited Water Availability through Integrated Modeling. Sustainability 10 (6): e1689. DOI:10.3390/su10061689.

Watanabe C, Naveed N, & Neittaanmäki P (2018). Digital solutions transform the forest-based bioeconomy into a digital platform industry - A suggestion for a disruptive business model in the digital economy. Technology in Society DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.05.002. (In Press)

Watanabe C, Tou Y, & Neittaanmäki P (2018). A new paradox of the digital economy - Structural sources of the limitation of GDP statistics. Technology in Society DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.05.004. (In Press)

Zhou T, Akiyama T, Horita M, Kharrazi A, Kraines S, Li J, & Yoshikawa K (2018). The Impact of Ecological Restoration Projects in Dry Lands: Data-based Assessment and Human Perceptions in the Lower Reaches of Heihe River Basin, China. Sustainability 10 (5): e1471. DOI:10.3390/su10051471.

Naveed K, Watanabe C, & Neittaanmäki P (2018). The transformative direction of innovation toward an IoT-based society - Increasing dependency on uncaptured GDP in global ICT firms. Technology in Society 53: 23-46. DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.11.003.

Wang J, Li L, Li F, Kharrazi A, & Bai Y (2018). Regional footprints and interregional interactions of chemical oxygen demand discharges in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 132: 386-397. DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.008.

Komendantova N & Stepanova A (2018). Impacts of Risk Perceptions on Foreign Direct Investment in Energy Generation and Transmission Projects in Russia. Energy Systems Research: 44-50. DOI:10.25729/esr.2018.01.0005.

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
Phone: (+43 2236) 807 0 Fax:(+43 2236) 71 313