05 August 2013
The study, published in the journal Environmental Science & Policy by researchers at Center for International Climate and Environmental Research Oslo (CICERO) and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), calculates the climate impact of travel identified by the latest German national travel survey.
The study assesses the climate impact of German travel behavior by transport mode, income class and travel distance. Car and air travel are responsible for about 90% of the climate impact. Air travel has a higher specific climate impact per person kilometer, but after adjusting for travel volumes, the split between car and air travel is equal.
“Despite the similarity in the CO2 emissions from air and car travel per person kilometer, our analysis considered a broader range of climate impacts,” says CICERO researcher Borgar Aamaas, who led the study. Aamaas started the study as part of his work in IIASA’s 2011 Young Scientist Summer Program. “The climate impact of air travel is almost doubled due to the additional impact from contrail formation,” he says.
The average German flies twice a year, but because of the longer distances travelled those trips account for almost half of the climate impact from personal travel. “Two inner-European trips by aircraft can equal the climate impact from a whole year's driving,” says IIASA researcher Jens Borken-Kleefeld.
The study finds that the few long trips (longer than 100 km, by any means of transport) stand for more than half of the total climate impact. “One long-distance holiday return trip has the same impact as more than two months of regular urban travel,” says Aamaas, “Likewise, a medium distance leisure round trip has the same impact as 7 days of regular urban travel.”
“The rich fly and travel the most. As the income doubles, the distance flown is more than doubled,” says Aamaas. Yet the much larger middle classes have the biggest share of the total climate impact.
The study takes Germany as example, but the researchers say their findings apply more broadly. The relatively few but long trips account for the majority of the impact. The use of aircraft and the fuel efficiency of the car are key determinants.
“There is no silver bullet to mitigate emissions from travel. A combination of different behavioral changes, efficiency improvements and transport policies will be needed,” says Borken-Kleefeld.
German travel volume is about five times higher than the global average.
“If the global population travelled as Germans for 50 years, the global temperature would increase by roughly 0.8 °C,” says CICERO researcher Glen Peters.
Aamaas, Borgar, Jens Borken-Kleefeld, and Glen P. Peters, 2013. The climate impact of travel behavior: a German case study with illustrative mitigation options. Environmental Science and Policy doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.06.009 - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901113001366
Last edited: 05 August 2013
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
Phone: (+43 2236) 807 0 Fax:(+43 2236) 71 313