Highlighting continued uncertainty in global land cover maps for the user community

Highlighting continued uncertainty in global land cover maps for the user community

Authors:   Fritz S, See L, McCallum I, Schill C, Obersteiner M, van der Velde M, Bottcher H, Havlik P, Achard F

Publication Year:   2011

Reference:  Environmental Research Letters, 6(4):044005 (October-December 2011) (Published online 21 October 2011)

Abstract

In the last 10 years a number of new global datasets have been created and new, more sophisticated alorithms have been designed to classify land cover. GlobCover and MODIS v.5 are the most recent global land cover products available, where GlobCover (300 m) has the finest spatial resolution of other comparable products such as MODIS v.5 (50 m) and GLC-2000 (1 km). This letter shows that the thematic accuracy in the cropland domain has decreased when comparing these two latest products. This disagreement is also evident spatially when examining maps of cropland and forest disargeement between GLC-2000, MODIS and GlobCover. The analysis highlights the continued uncertainty surrounding these prducts, with a combined forest and cropland disagreement of 893 Mha (GlobCover versus MODIS v.5). This letter suggests that data sharing efforts and the provision of more 'in situ' data for training, calibration and validation are very important conditions for improving future global land cover products.

VIEW CONTENT

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
Phone: (+43 2236) 807 0 Fax:(+43 2236) 71 313

Twitter Facebook Youtube
Follow us on