| Will China's leaders
continue to modernize the country's agricultural sector and food industry by further
promoting (basic) science and technological development? There are signs that China's government has given science and technology high
priority. It is downsizing the old apparatus of mammoth, state-run research institutions
with thousands of "lifetime" employees and supporting smaller, high-quality
research groups. The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), established in
1985, is growing rapidly. It is modeled after the US National Science Foundation and
provides funds to individual researchers or research groups. The NSFC also uses a
peer-review procedure to judge the quality of proposals. Although the NSFC budget is
minimal compared with the research funds of ministries and the Chinese Academy of Science,
it has supported some of the most spectacular research in China. Even the Chinese Academy
of Science, the dominant state-run research establishment with 123 institutes and 80,000
employees, will be reducing its staff by two-thirds to strengthen research capacities for
the remaining scientists. It is obvious that China's leaders want to "revitalize
China through science and education," as stated in their five-year plan (for 1996 to
2000). With this in mind, some Western analysts now expect China to become a world leader
in science and technology within a few decades.
This conclusion might be premature. It is unlikely that
China's government will abandon its tendency to interfere with science. It is also naive
to believe that a golden age of intellectual and individual freedom has begun in China
that will nurture an explosion in scientific creativity and excellence. While Chinese
scientists and intellectuals now discuss many issues with remarkable frankness, there are
still clear limits as to what is allowed in public. Criticism of government decisions -
even when supported by scientific evidence - is risky or impossible, as in the case of the
Three Gorges Dam project. The government also tries to restrict access to the Internet and
certain financial information services.
On the other hand, there is a growing flow of information in and out of China. Although
satellite dishes are officially forbidden, some 500,000 units were sold in 1993. It is
estimated that in the early 1990s some six million homes were already watching Hong Kong
TV - without the need for satellite dishes (Hornik, 1994, pp. 28-42). In 1989 China had
some 267,000 subscribers to international direct dialing (IDD) telephone services, by 1996
there were 24.3 million subscribers (CSY, 1997, p. 540). Some 530,000 foreign tourists
(excluding those from Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) visited China in 1980; by 1996 there
were more than 6.7 million tourists, mainly from Japan and the USA (CSY, 1997, 611).
It is very difficult to predict how science and technology
will evolve in China. If the ruling class constrains its political and ideological
influence in this sector, it is quite likely that the country's immensely talented and
motivated scientists will drive China's modernization. Particularly in the field of
science, however, it would be devastating, if China's rulers would choose loyalty over
competence. |