| WaterComplexity: Agents, Volatility, Evidence and Scale (CAVES) |
The CAVES project started in March 2005 and lasted for 37 months.
The purpose of the CAVES project was to couple policy concerns for complex human-environmental systems with linked physical, biological and social computer models based soundly in complexity science.
To achieve this purpose, the project met three specific objectives:
- Evidence: The substantial qualitative and statistical evidence brought to
the project by partners responsible for the case studies was further developed to inform the
design and stakeholder validation of models of land use.
- Models: Agent based social models linked to biogeophysical models were
developed to investigate why some external shocks to complex social networks are followed by
volatile episodes and some are not. The models were based on and constrained by qualitative and
statistical evidence.
- Generalisation: Clusters of consistent models were developed at several
levels and axes of aggregation that, at the most descriptive level, captured the relevant detail
of complex systems and, at the most abstract level, allowed for closed-form solutions and ready
comparison with models in the literature on complex systems.
The main activities included:
- Evidence gathering and knowledge elicitation
- Modeling procedures
- Validation of models
The goal was to produce a constructive demonstration of modeling procedures for the formation of social policy
in conditions of uncertainty. To do so, a set of case studies of land use change driven by a variety of
physical, biological and sociopolitical phenomena in the face of developing internal stresses and
external shocks, were produced.
The models associated with these case studies and their use by the relevant stakeholders were tested on how
well agent based models of real, complex social networks enhance our understanding of both social
processes and, more generally, processes in complex networks when those models are validated both
qualitatively and quantitatively.
Three case studies were chosen, that differ significantly in apparent resilience to both internal
stresses and external shocks and also differ with respect to culture and ethnography.
- One study was
of the Grampian Region of Scotland in the UK where, despite a range of external shocks and endogenous
demographic change, land tenure and use has not changed greatly since the Second World War despite
large-scale policy changes with entry to the European Union, and epidemics among agricultural livestock.
- The second was of the Oder River Valley in Poland, which has undergone considerable changes in land
use, water regime and social structure over that period.
- The third was of the Vhembe district of
Limpopo province, South Africa (chosen partly to ensure that our models are relevant beyond Europe)
where land use change following the end of apartheid has been rapid and enormous.
The CAVES project produced models of the evolution of social networks conditioned by interaction
among social institutions and the physical and biological environment.
The scientific purpose of the project was to identify reasons why some complex systems seem to be more
resilient to internal stresses and external shocks than other systems.
The technological and applied objective of the project was to prove a method whereby models of
complexity can be used to capture observed social processes and to formulate social policies
conditioned by social and natural complexity.
Funding Agency:
European Commission
Project time frame:
March 2005 to March 2008
IIASA Researchers:
Jan Sendzimir
Piotr Magnuszewski
For more information, contact Jan Sendzimir
Responsible for this page: Jun Watabe
Last updated:
24 Feb 2011
|