 |
 |
|

|
Impact |
|
Policy
Impacts
•
Strategic
Impacts
•
Strengthening
the European Research Area •
Added
Value of a European-level project •
Interactions
with other Research Activities
•
Contribution
to Policy Developments

The FinE project’s dynamic approach to fish stocks
as study systems in conjunction with a modern understanding of the
effects of exploitation on patterns of growth, reproduction, population
diversification, and their genetic underpinning will greatly benefit
both basic science and the development of management strategies
capable of ensuring the sustainable exploitation of living marine
resources. Knowledge and insights assembled within this project
on particular species will easily be transferred to additional commercially
important species within European waters.
|
| Policy
Impacts |
|
Ensuring the long-term sustainable exploitation of fish stocks and
implementing the ecosystem approach to fisheries
Fisheries provide an essential source of food, employment, recreation,
and economic well-being for people – throughout Europe, and
especially so in coastal areas away from the major centres of industrial
and economic activities. Fisheries have the capacity of benefiting
both present and future generations and should therefore be conducted
in a responsible manner ensuring sustainable exploitation. While
modern information technology offers new possibilities for diversifying
the economic basis of less-favoured regions outside urbanized areas,
fishing will undoubtedly continue to be an important source of employment,
recreation, and economic activity for many coastal communities in
Europe. Promoting the sustainable use of marine resources thus promotes
equity in Europe. To secure the continued viability of coastal regions,
it is important that marine resources be utilized in a maximally
sustainable manner. This can be achieved through policies formulated
on the basis of best possible scientific knowledge.
The FinE project will provide scientific insights about fisheries-induced
evolution, a specific and, until recently underappreciated, threat
to both long-term sustainable fisheries and biodiversity. This treat
deserves a closer look for three reasons:
- First,
fisheries-induced adaptive changes in exploited fish stocks may
jeopardize their sustained value as renewable resources. This
may include a gradual loss of productivity and deterioration of
quality (average size) of the harvest, an increase in the variability
of annual harvests, and a risk of abrupt stock collapses.
- Second,
applying the precautionary approach to the management of marine
resources establishes higher requirements for the consideration
of potential threats, such as those posed by fisheries-induced
genetic changes, even if these threats would not be deemed immediate
but would be manifested in the medium or long term.
- Third,
fisheries-induced evolution is highly relevant in the context
of an ecosystem approach to fisheries: by affecting the genetic
composition of populations, it modifies within- and between-populations
genetic variation, two major constituents of biodiversity, and
may additionally interact with functioning of entire ecosystems.
More specifically, the FinE project will enable the
- Evaluation
of the ubiquity and extent of fisheries-induced evolution among
a wide range of commercially exploited fish species characterized
by contrasting life histories and distributed over a vast geographical
area – a critical need if any informed management actions
are to be undertaken;
- Understanding
of the genetic underpinnings of life-history trait responses to
fisheries-induced selection, in order to identify the evolutionary
genetics of these responses and evaluate their degree of reversibility
through adequate policies;
- Identification
of those species that are intrinsically most at risk because of
their life history and therefore require closer monitoring and
more decisive management actions;
- Incorporation
of the effects of fisheries-induced evolution on fish stock dynamics
into management strategies and recovery plans;
- Consideration
of socio-economic causes and consequences of fisheries-induced
evolution, in the choice of management strategies; and
- Evaluation
of management strategies for mitigating fisheries-induced evolution
and for restoring fish stocks to identified reference points.
|
| Strategic
Impacts |
|
Integrating fisheries science, life-history theory, and population/quantitative
genetics
A far-reaching divide – between the cultures underlying fisheries
science on the one hand and evolutionary biology on the other, and,
to a lesser degree, between life-history theory and population/quantitative
genetics within evolutionary biology – has largely prevented
these three major fields to inform and guide each other to the degree
that is both perfectly achievable and urgently needed today. The
benefits to be reaped from overcoming this divide can be unfolded
in three different dimensions:
- In
fisheries science itself, a strong need currently exists for developing
the expertise required for implementing new international conventions,
such as those about the conservation of biological diversity or
the application of the precautionary principle in marine exploitation.
Although many nations are officially committed to the corresponding
United Nations’ resolutions and similar regulations, a strong
scientific basis for their operational implementation still needs
to be established. The FinE project offers to contribute to this
endeavour by producing collections of suitable tools and valuable
scientific insights on fisheries-induced evolution. It must be
anticipated that, in the medium term, any research centre charged
with providing scientific advice on fish stock management, be
it at national or international levels, will require tools that
can detect fisheries-induced adaptive change and inform decision
makers about options for sustainable management, by avoiding negative
effects on population viability and productivity.
- Life-history
theory, in principle, has a lot to offer in relation to sustainable
resource management. At present, however, the theory is still
relatively far from realizing its full potential. First of all,
research in life-history theory needs more intimate links with
empirical studies. Bringing together carefully selected case studies
from fisheries science with innovative modelling methodology from
life-history theory therefore holds huge promise. In terms of
sample size, data from fisheries science is often of a quality
unachievable in the small-scale life-history experiments traditionally
used for testing and developing the theory. We therefore believe
that practitioners of life-history theory have much to gain from
being confronted with fisheries data and the resulting questions.
This interface will provide unique opportunities for further scientific
understanding of how organisms adjust their diversity of life
histories to different situations in a natural setting of ecological
complexity.
- Similar
to life-history theory, population genetics and quantitative genetics
are, in theory, optimal tools for dealing with evolutionary changes
induced by the exploitation of natural resources. However, so
far both fields have addressed exploitation-related issues from
another angle. Population genetics has been focusing mostly on
the effect of fishing on neutral genetic variation, thus neglecting
adaptive genetic changes and their effects on life-history traits
and the productivity of fish stocks. The framework of quantitative
genetics has been mostly applied to aquaculture issues, in order
to improve production by altering life-history traits such as
growth or survival in directions favourable for human consumption
in terms of yield and quality. Unfortunately, insights from the
controlled and manipulated environments of aquaculture have proved
to be difficult to extrapolate to natural conditions. Both population
genetics and quantitative genetics would make a great step forward
by orienting research towards genetic changes of adaptive value
affecting life-history traits in the wild. The long history of
fisheries biology and the associated archival material (scales
and otoliths) available in fisheries research institutes worldwide
provide unique opportunities for directly studying the temporal
path of evolutionary genetic changes.
|
|
| Strengthening
the European Research Area |
|
Strategically, FinE will maintain and extend the leading position of European
research in the application of evolutionary theory, population genetics,
and quantitative genetics to exploited ecosystems. So far, European researchers
have been at the forefront of bringing these topics to the awareness of
the scientific community and of devising first operational tools for tackling
the relevant scientific and managerial problems. More specifically, Europe
has played a leading role in establishing, on the global scientific agenda,
results and questions associated with fisheries-induced evolution. Accordingly,
researchers in, for example, the UK, the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark,
and Austria have been at the forefront of scientific developments in this
burgeoning field. The FinE consortium will now be able to capitalize on
this experience in the course of extending and deepening insights into
the corresponding theoretical and practical questions.
With the science underlying the FinE project having a very strong European
basis, partners will have the opportunity to use the project’s activities
as a prestigious springboard for international collaborations and contributions,
thereby naturally becoming part of an important and truly international
scientific enterprise. In addition, the project will provide an extremely
favourable environment for training and transfer of knowledge, as well
as for career opportunities for young European scientists hired at the
PhD or postdoctoral levels.
|
| Added
Value of a European-level Project |
|
The oceans have no obvious boundaries which promotes the mobility of both
fishes and fishing fleets. Accordingly, this necessitates cooperative
management of marine resources as well as problem solving and research
conducted at a transnational level. Furthermore, there is also legal incentive
for international cooperation. According to the United Nations Convention
on the Law of the Sea from 1982, coastal states have both rights and responsibilities
for the management and use of fishery resources within their 200 nautical
mile exclusive economic zones. Fish know no borders, and the distribution
areas of many fish stocks with major commercial returns are stretched
over exclusive economic zones of several coastal states (even when acknowledging
that the European Community is considered just one coastal state). These
are known as straddling stocks, and the Law of the Sea commits coastal
states to cooperate for management of such stocks. Furthermore, fisheries
management is increasingly moving from the management of single stocks
toward the management of whole ecosystems. This implies that successful
management of marine resources requires integration of knowledge and consideration
of objectives at several levels, ranging from local level to the European
Community level and, indeed, the whole Europe. Similarly, it is important
that research supporting future policy making takes into consideration
knowledge and experience covering sufficiently extensive areas, such that
regional peculiarities are not overlooked. This is especially important
as some management measures may imply short-term economic and social hardship
to local communities.
As previously described, the FinE project is likely to have widespread
and very tangible policy implications at national, European, and international
levels. This optimistic expectation is strengthened by the fact that,
through inclusion of thirteen teams as partners or sub-contractors based
at national agencies charged with providing scientific advice on fishing
policies in Europe (Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland,
Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands, UK) and North America
(Canada), the FinE project is uniquely positioned to aid the process of
translating scientific progress into practical management at a wide geo-political
level. In addition, the combination of the various fields of expertise
necessary for unravelling fisheries-induced evolution and its effects
of fish stocks and fisheries is only made possible by gathering a consortium
at the European level. No national research agency can claim to have in
its ranks experts with equal competences in marine biology, population
genetics and quantitative genetics, life-history theory, population dynamics,
evolutionary theory, fisheries science, and the management of living resources.
|
| Interactions
with Existing National and EU-level Research Activities |
|
The FinE project will interact with, and integrate the activities of,
ongoing national and international research projects. In many of these,
members of the FinE consortium are participating or have undergoing collaborations.
More specifically, a strong integration in terms of methodology and results
is foreseen with the following projects: the Marie Curie Research Training
Network FishACE (Fisheries-induced adaptive changes in exploited stocks);
the Scientific Support for Policies initiatives UNCOVER (Understanding
the mechanisms of stock recovery), EFIMAS (Evaluating scientific advice
and decision-making processes in fisheries management systems), COMMIT
(Committing to tailor-made long-term fishery management strategies), INDECO
(Development of Indicators of Environmental Performance of the Common
Fisheries Policy), and PROTECT (Marine protected areas as a tool for ecosystem
conservation and fisheries management); the Networks of Excellence MARBEF
(Marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning), EUROCEANS (European network
of excellence for ocean ecosystems analysis), and MGE (Marine Genomics
Europe); as well as the Norwegian breeding programme for cod (Dr. Madjid
Delghandi, Norwegian Institute of Fisheries and Aquaculture Research,
Tromsø, Norway) and the Norwegian cod genome project (Dr. Christian
Mittelholzer, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway).
|
| Contribution
to Policy Developments |
|
The consortium will deliver a concise policy implementation plan (PIP)
describing the project’s policy relevant research findings and a
proposal on how these might be applied within the EU and national policy
frameworks.
At or before the end of the project, the PIP will be prepared in collaboration
between all partners, and submitted to the Commission by the coordinator.
The PIP will detail how the consortium proposes to apply the results to
fisheries policy and management. Specifically, the PIP will describe the
potential implications of the obtained research results for policy frameworks
(including legislation, control, potential cost savings, and economic
impacts) in the short, mid-, and long term, and will summarize the project’s
overall policy-guidance conclusions. The targeted readers of this deliverable
will be policymakers, stakeholders, and officials concerned with policy-management
issues.
The PIP will be prepared as a free-style text document written as an executive
policy summary, with a maximal length of three A4 pages (Task 5.9 in WP5).
Integration of the PIP’s content into the planned booklet on fisheries-induced
evolution (Task 5.8 in WP5) will be considered.
Further plans for the transfer of knowledge and dissemination are detailed
in Section 6.2, as well as in the context of Tasks 5.2, 5.5, 5.6, and
5.7 in WP5.
|
|
Back to FinE home page
Responsible for this page: Melanie
Wenighofer
Last updated:
19 Jan 2009
|