Impact

Policy Impacts Strategic Impacts Strengthening the European Research Area Added Value of a European-level project Interactions with other Research Activities Contribution to Policy Developments

The FinE project’s dynamic approach to fish stocks as study systems in conjunction with a modern understanding of the effects of exploitation on patterns of growth, reproduction, population diversification, and their genetic underpinning will greatly benefit both basic science and the development of management strategies capable of ensuring the sustainable exploitation of living marine resources. Knowledge and insights assembled within this project on particular species will easily be transferred to additional commercially important species within European waters.

 

Policy Impacts


Ensuring the long-term sustainable exploitation of fish stocks and implementing the ecosystem approach to fisheries


Fisheries provide an essential source of food, employment, recreation, and economic well-being for people – throughout Europe, and especially so in coastal areas away from the major centres of industrial and economic activities. Fisheries have the capacity of benefiting both present and future generations and should therefore be conducted in a responsible manner ensuring sustainable exploitation. While modern information technology offers new possibilities for diversifying the economic basis of less-favoured regions outside urbanized areas, fishing will undoubtedly continue to be an important source of employment, recreation, and economic activity for many coastal communities in Europe. Promoting the sustainable use of marine resources thus promotes equity in Europe. To secure the continued viability of coastal regions, it is important that marine resources be utilized in a maximally sustainable manner. This can be achieved through policies formulated on the basis of best possible scientific knowledge.
The FinE project will provide scientific insights about fisheries-induced evolution, a specific and, until recently underappreciated, threat to both long-term sustainable fisheries and biodiversity. This treat deserves a closer look for three reasons:

  • First, fisheries-induced adaptive changes in exploited fish stocks may jeopardize their sustained value as renewable resources. This may include a gradual loss of productivity and deterioration of quality (average size) of the harvest, an increase in the variability of annual harvests, and a risk of abrupt stock collapses.
  • Second, applying the precautionary approach to the management of marine resources establishes higher requirements for the consideration of potential threats, such as those posed by fisheries-induced genetic changes, even if these threats would not be deemed immediate but would be manifested in the medium or long term.
  • Third, fisheries-induced evolution is highly relevant in the context of an ecosystem approach to fisheries: by affecting the genetic composition of populations, it modifies within- and between-populations genetic variation, two major constituents of biodiversity, and may additionally interact with functioning of entire ecosystems.

More specifically, the FinE project will enable the

  • Evaluation of the ubiquity and extent of fisheries-induced evolution among a wide range of commercially exploited fish species characterized by contrasting life histories and distributed over a vast geographical area – a critical need if any informed management actions are to be undertaken;
  • Understanding of the genetic underpinnings of life-history trait responses to fisheries-induced selection, in order to identify the evolutionary genetics of these responses and evaluate their degree of reversibility through adequate policies;
  • Identification of those species that are intrinsically most at risk because of their life history and therefore require closer monitoring and more decisive management actions;
  • Incorporation of the effects of fisheries-induced evolution on fish stock dynamics into management strategies and recovery plans;
  • Consideration of socio-economic causes and consequences of fisheries-induced evolution, in the choice of management strategies; and
  • Evaluation of management strategies for mitigating fisheries-induced evolution and for restoring fish stocks to identified reference points.

 

Strategic Impacts


Integrating fisheries science, life-history theory, and population/quantitative genetics


A far-reaching divide – between the cultures underlying fisheries science on the one hand and evolutionary biology on the other, and, to a lesser degree, between life-history theory and population/quantitative genetics within evolutionary biology – has largely prevented these three major fields to inform and guide each other to the degree that is both perfectly achievable and urgently needed today. The benefits to be reaped from overcoming this divide can be unfolded in three different dimensions:

  • In fisheries science itself, a strong need currently exists for developing the expertise required for implementing new international conventions, such as those about the conservation of biological diversity or the application of the precautionary principle in marine exploitation. Although many nations are officially committed to the corresponding United Nations’ resolutions and similar regulations, a strong scientific basis for their operational implementation still needs to be established. The FinE project offers to contribute to this endeavour by producing collections of suitable tools and valuable scientific insights on fisheries-induced evolution. It must be anticipated that, in the medium term, any research centre charged with providing scientific advice on fish stock management, be it at national or international levels, will require tools that can detect fisheries-induced adaptive change and inform decision makers about options for sustainable management, by avoiding negative effects on population viability and productivity.
  • Life-history theory, in principle, has a lot to offer in relation to sustainable resource management. At present, however, the theory is still relatively far from realizing its full potential. First of all, research in life-history theory needs more intimate links with empirical studies. Bringing together carefully selected case studies from fisheries science with innovative modelling methodology from life-history theory therefore holds huge promise. In terms of sample size, data from fisheries science is often of a quality unachievable in the small-scale life-history experiments traditionally used for testing and developing the theory. We therefore believe that practitioners of life-history theory have much to gain from being confronted with fisheries data and the resulting questions. This interface will provide unique opportunities for further scientific understanding of how organisms adjust their diversity of life histories to different situations in a natural setting of ecological complexity.
  • Similar to life-history theory, population genetics and quantitative genetics are, in theory, optimal tools for dealing with evolutionary changes induced by the exploitation of natural resources. However, so far both fields have addressed exploitation-related issues from another angle. Population genetics has been focusing mostly on the effect of fishing on neutral genetic variation, thus neglecting adaptive genetic changes and their effects on life-history traits and the productivity of fish stocks. The framework of quantitative genetics has been mostly applied to aquaculture issues, in order to improve production by altering life-history traits such as growth or survival in directions favourable for human consumption in terms of yield and quality. Unfortunately, insights from the controlled and manipulated environments of aquaculture have proved to be difficult to extrapolate to natural conditions. Both population genetics and quantitative genetics would make a great step forward by orienting research towards genetic changes of adaptive value affecting life-history traits in the wild. The long history of fisheries biology and the associated archival material (scales and otoliths) available in fisheries research institutes worldwide provide unique opportunities for directly studying the temporal path of evolutionary genetic changes.

 

Strengthening the European Research Area


Strategically, FinE will maintain and extend the leading position of European research in the application of evolutionary theory, population genetics, and quantitative genetics to exploited ecosystems. So far, European researchers have been at the forefront of bringing these topics to the awareness of the scientific community and of devising first operational tools for tackling the relevant scientific and managerial problems. More specifically, Europe has played a leading role in establishing, on the global scientific agenda, results and questions associated with fisheries-induced evolution. Accordingly, researchers in, for example, the UK, the Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, and Austria have been at the forefront of scientific developments in this burgeoning field. The FinE consortium will now be able to capitalize on this experience in the course of extending and deepening insights into the corresponding theoretical and practical questions.
With the science underlying the FinE project having a very strong European basis, partners will have the opportunity to use the project’s activities as a prestigious springboard for international collaborations and contributions, thereby naturally becoming part of an important and truly international scientific enterprise. In addition, the project will provide an extremely favourable environment for training and transfer of knowledge, as well as for career opportunities for young European scientists hired at the PhD or postdoctoral levels.

 

Added Value of a European-level Project


The oceans have no obvious boundaries which promotes the mobility of both fishes and fishing fleets. Accordingly, this necessitates cooperative management of marine resources as well as problem solving and research conducted at a transnational level. Furthermore, there is also legal incentive for international cooperation. According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea from 1982, coastal states have both rights and responsibilities for the management and use of fishery resources within their 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zones. Fish know no borders, and the distribution areas of many fish stocks with major commercial returns are stretched over exclusive economic zones of several coastal states (even when acknowledging that the European Community is considered just one coastal state). These are known as straddling stocks, and the Law of the Sea commits coastal states to cooperate for management of such stocks. Furthermore, fisheries management is increasingly moving from the management of single stocks toward the management of whole ecosystems. This implies that successful management of marine resources requires integration of knowledge and consideration of objectives at several levels, ranging from local level to the European Community level and, indeed, the whole Europe. Similarly, it is important that research supporting future policy making takes into consideration knowledge and experience covering sufficiently extensive areas, such that regional peculiarities are not overlooked. This is especially important as some management measures may imply short-term economic and social hardship to local communities.
As previously described, the FinE project is likely to have widespread and very tangible policy implications at national, European, and international levels. This optimistic expectation is strengthened by the fact that, through inclusion of thirteen teams as partners or sub-contractors based at national agencies charged with providing scientific advice on fishing policies in Europe (Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands, UK) and North America (Canada), the FinE project is uniquely positioned to aid the process of translating scientific progress into practical management at a wide geo-political level. In addition, the combination of the various fields of expertise necessary for unravelling fisheries-induced evolution and its effects of fish stocks and fisheries is only made possible by gathering a consortium at the European level. No national research agency can claim to have in its ranks experts with equal competences in marine biology, population genetics and quantitative genetics, life-history theory, population dynamics, evolutionary theory, fisheries science, and the management of living resources.

 

Interactions with Existing National and EU-level Research Activities


The FinE project will interact with, and integrate the activities of, ongoing national and international research projects. In many of these, members of the FinE consortium are participating or have undergoing collaborations.
More specifically, a strong integration in terms of methodology and results is foreseen with the following projects: the Marie Curie Research Training Network FishACE (Fisheries-induced adaptive changes in exploited stocks); the Scientific Support for Policies initiatives UNCOVER (Understanding the mechanisms of stock recovery), EFIMAS (Evaluating scientific advice and decision-making processes in fisheries management systems), COMMIT (Committing to tailor-made long-term fishery management strategies), INDECO (Development of Indicators of Environmental Performance of the Common Fisheries Policy), and PROTECT (Marine protected areas as a tool for ecosystem conservation and fisheries management); the Networks of Excellence MARBEF (Marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning), EUROCEANS (European network of excellence for ocean ecosystems analysis), and MGE (Marine Genomics Europe); as well as the Norwegian breeding programme for cod (Dr. Madjid Delghandi, Norwegian Institute of Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Tromsø, Norway) and the Norwegian cod genome project (Dr. Christian Mittelholzer, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway).

 

Contribution to Policy Developments


The consortium will deliver a concise policy implementation plan (PIP) describing the project’s policy relevant research findings and a proposal on how these might be applied within the EU and national policy frameworks.
At or before the end of the project, the PIP will be prepared in collaboration between all partners, and submitted to the Commission by the coordinator. The PIP will detail how the consortium proposes to apply the results to fisheries policy and management. Specifically, the PIP will describe the potential implications of the obtained research results for policy frameworks (including legislation, control, potential cost savings, and economic impacts) in the short, mid-, and long term, and will summarize the project’s overall policy-guidance conclusions. The targeted readers of this deliverable will be policymakers, stakeholders, and officials concerned with policy-management issues.
The PIP will be prepared as a free-style text document written as an executive policy summary, with a maximal length of three A4 pages (Task 5.9 in WP5). Integration of the PIP’s content into the planned booklet on fisheries-induced evolution (Task 5.8 in WP5) will be considered.
Further plans for the transfer of knowledge and dissemination are detailed in Section 6.2, as well as in the context of Tasks 5.2, 5.5, 5.6, and 5.7 in WP5.

 

Back to FinE home page

 

Responsible for this page: Melanie Wenighofer
Last updated: 19 Jan 2009